Total Pageviews

What Matters About Me

My photo
I am who I am, not what I have done. For those who care about pedigree, I have little more than being a former public school teacher and a pastor/denominational adminstrator. The following insights come from a couple of tests I took. They may explain why I am a Contrarian and why I decided to do a blog about it. The first test is a standardized personality profile. The second is something strange called a Brain Type test! 1)“Jack lives outside traditional boundaries and ahead of the curve. When others focus on limitations, Jack creates new possibilities and ideas. He is a doer, not just a dreamer. Well grounded in reality, logic and analytical thinking. He enjoys meeting and working with other creative and ambitious people...a fearless leader. Only 3-5% of U.S. population has these qualities.” 2) Jack's Intellectual Type is Word Warrior. This means he has exceptional verbal skills. He can can easily make sense of complex issues and takes an unusually creative approach to solving problems. His strengths also make him a visionary. Even without trying he's able to come up with lots of new and creative ideas. (Like blogging as Contrarian?)

This challenges common ideas about the purpose of praying. Not a rehash of old dogma.

This challenges common ideas about the purpose of praying. Not a rehash of old dogma.
Click Image to purchase - Search Jack Corbin Getz Or Check major online book sellers.

Search This Blog

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Loosening The Bonds of Racial Tension

Loosening The Bonds of Racial Tension

Here goes. I am an old white guy living in Atlanta - the capital of southern racism - who wants to make a statement about race relations in America today. It's not an easy task, mainly because racial unrest is reportedly high, at least that's what we see daily on television news reports. And, what does an old white guy raised in a racially segregated Chicago 60 years ago know about the issue of today's African Americans?

To answer that, allow me to establish myself as one who speaks from experience, not from a vacuum. This is really not about my trying on the hero's mantle, but a treatise as to why I feel my observations are mat least marginally credible.

I will stick to things I know and not deal with things I don't. I will couch things in the context of a lifetime spent in social services, not banking. I have seen the other side and today I have a slew of friends who are people of color. Yes, we know each other's names and phone numbers. Three of my ethnic neighbors regularly tell me I am their "favorite" neighbor, maybe because I do everything I can to help them, as they do for me.

Regularly, to my wife's embarrassment, I speak to strangers, many of whom are African Americans who seem pleased to engage in conversations, and often stranger hugs. Things like this used to annoy me when my dad did them, but I have his outgoing nature and use it as an ambassador for racial goodwill every chance I get. (Now my kids get embarassed with me.)

Maybe its because of the over-publicized nature of racial tension in America, and my upbringing and experience, but I go out of my way to open doors for ethnic strangers, some of whom are older than me, but also for those younger who look shocked to see a smiling, chatty old white guy showing them such respect.

I interact playfully with almost every African American person I meet. And they always respond politely and with warmth. I love every one of my "kids" who serve as waiters in restaurants and clerks in stores, many of whom work in jobs that are far from career-level opportunities. I also ask if I can take their pictures so I can remember their names the next time we meet. My wife and I also help a number of them with tangible and emotional support when we perceive a need. It is no stretch to say that I am positively involved with, not removed from, the African American and ethnic pulse of my world.

As I said, I am no hero, just a friendly old guy who wants to reach across the racial barriers to make my neighborhood and city a better place, one encounter at a time.

That said, my first observation about today's unrest is that there is a great deal of pent-up anger in both white and black communities. Some is spilling out right now in the cities, and some is boiling beneath the surface of people fed up with all the crying we see from community activists who appear to want us to hate each other. Because of them, a racial war is not something that can be discounted as impossible in the near future.

Most of these tensions are NOT generated, however, by average citizens. Everywhere I go people are friendly, if not deferential, polite, generous, kind and courteous. My feeling is that very few people create any problems but most want peace. Clearly, it's the professional racists who feed on fear and anger, taking every opportunity to stir up the passions of marginalized youth for some ideological or political gain.

When national leaders of racial movements see the opportunity to advance their agenda in front of a camera, they naturally seize it. They often import protestors, rioters and convince vulnerable kids to “feel the burn”,  and naturally some choose to hit the streets, usually armed with bad behavior and catchy slogans that are neither accurate nor fair.

It doesn't matter that Trevon was the aggressor in his tragic shooting case,  and according to grand jury eye witnesses, he never said "Hands up, don't shoot!". But the professional racists perpetuate that chant because it supports their script, true or not.

Finally, every shooting by a police officer, justified or not, is a tragedy, but the professional race-baiters want it to be all about racism, maybe because it helps their political agenda. Each shooting or beating is a different case, each tragic, all based in the moment and the actions of both parties, not just “racists” cops.

The perception that white cops are always out to abuse and diminish minorities is pure bull. Does that ever happen? Sure, but not as much as the professionals want you to think. Remember, racial tension is good for their brand, but not for America.

To the race baiting professionals, the masses of people peacefully and respectfully co-existing is not good for business. I believe they crave the opportunity to get in front of the camera as the public voice for all oppressed minorites, pleading for funding while vieing for the empty throne of the noble Martin Luther King Jr.

I find myself trapped between loving every African American I know, and hating the race I don't know. How is that possible? The answer is simple. African Americans are not being served well by those who clam to represent them or report on them. The business of racism is pure gold when it hits the air waves, but I never experience those angry protestors in my world. I see wonderful people who contribute far more to me than I do to them.

Truthfully, if either side of the color line base their feelings in the bunk the media sells, not face to face interactions, they will either become overt or subliminal racists, and the tension created by them will only be released in violence and more tragedy.

The dream of MLK is the same for all of us.  Let's do what we can to forget the color of our race and just be contributing members of the human race.


Jack C. Getz

Saturday, July 9, 2016

The WholeTruth



Whenever I hear people talk about a "half truth" I wonder what they mean. To me it implies part of a statement is true, but part is also untrue, so you get the best of both worlds rolled into one. You can lie and get away with something as long as some modicum of what you say sounds plausible, or even just well-intended.

It sounds like what politicians do with every breath.

In moving toward my own personal and social integrity, I discovered something powerful about this thing called truth. Like a coin, truth has two distinct yet complementary sides. One side is truth - telling things correctly, and the other side is honesty - telling things completely. Don't be fooled. There is a huge difference between the two. That's' why the truth coin carries more value than any other currency. Truth is the external search for reality. Honesty is internal search for it.

That couplet is more than a clever use of language. It's the bedrock foundation of all human healthy communication and is also the source of most of our difficulties in society. It's relatively inexpensive to tell things correctly, but it's incredibly costly to tell things completely.

A homey illustration help us understand the difference. If I ask you if you left the restaurant server a tip, you can say yes or no. If you say yes, I assume all is well. But if you left only a penny and kept that to yourself, your truthfulness would be discredited by your lack of personal honesty.

Politicians do his all the time...virtually every time they speak. They use an opponent's comment out of context to paint the worst possible picture of their adversary, making them sounds awful when their position might have be quite appropriate. We saw a political advertisement last year where a man was pushing granny over the cliff in her wheel chair because he voted against a pork-filled bill. "If you don't agree with me, you are obstreperous, even hard-hearted or a hater. If you are pro-choice you hate babies and vise versa. If you support private gun ownership you are contributing to gun violence."  Such is the logic of politicians and other liars.

We hear someone trying to kill the second amendment because they want gun registrations for convicted felons. Or, someone hates clean water because they don't vote for a radical resolution that saves tadpoles but kills the farming industry of a state.

Winning politicians usuall can't be honest. It costs far too much. Those who try being ethical or logical never get out of the starting gate. Some office seekers sound truthful by saying they support clean energy, but the odds are high that they get big support from the clean energy industry.

While all of this is true, and honest, don't be too hard on our political elites, we are usually just as bad. We say things that are correct on the surface, but not complete in the details. Some statements of honesty have little consequences, like we left a tip when what we left was in fact more insulting than helpful. Only we and the truck stop server know the whole truth.

But when it comes to being honest, or complete with our lives, and the consequences too heavy to accept, we manage to wiggle out of the honesty part while desperately trying to keep some - or all - of the truthful part in tact. That's called manipulation, deflection and/or deceit. It happens when someone asks if you are having an affair and your answer is "I never had sexual relations with that woman".  That kind of answer ignores the question while attempting to present a form of truth that will get one off the hook. But it depends on skewing one's  definition of truth so others will be fooled, even though you know your ruse is sound up with dishonesty.  The cover-up is always done from fear of exposure with its consequent damages.

Jesus' simple teaching about how a person of character ought to answer questions carries significant moral weight. Let your answers be yes, or no. Anything else smacks of deceit. Or, you can't fudge the truth with a simple yes, or no.

It takes courage to make integrity-based statements, but by avoiding them you lose the positive and healing power of truth. That's why the court bailiff asks such a pointed, no escape clause type question, about your testimony: "Do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God?" Yes means yes, and no means no. Fibbing under oath purgers one's integrity making them useless in discovering the whole truth and nothing but he truth. Speaking the whole truth and accepting the consequences is a costly and courageous act, and very few can sustain that lifestyle.

One of my literary heroes, Mark Twain, wrote his death-bed autobiography with the condition that it would not be published for one hundred years after his death. Why? He wanted to be completely honest with his thoughts because he knew that pure honesty is impossible as long as there was a chance of doing harm to himself or others.

So, a white lie, a little cover-up or a bit of deceit are the techniques we use to stay our social and personal executions. Truth is easily manipulated, unless complete honesty is included in the calculation.

This principle of honesty, as laudable as it is, is not a license to be unkind, cruel or malicious. If we live the Golden Rule and accept the concept that all we do ought to be balanced by love and human civility, we may avoid looking like, or worse acting like those political creatures we so detest, both in and out of the government.

Honesty is the best policy is a good furry little proverb as long as we understand
that it also has very sharp teeth. As Hawthorne said in The Scarlet Letter: "Every man is living two." Some of our favorite living adages are like the cute fluffy little squirrels that entertain us in our yards. They are so winsome! Unless you get too close. Honesty is the same way. It's easy to claim or enjoy from afar, but when it jumps on you lap look out!

Okay, chew on this for awhile, and like me, look in the mirror while you do. It's personal, not social.

Jack Getz
July 9, 2016